Thyssenkrupp and Tata Steel run out of room for more JV concessions
Thyssenkrupp and Tata Steel have expressed that there is little scope for making more concessions to try to win regulatory approval for a planned joint venture.
The firms, which have been working for three years on a deal that would create Europe’s second-biggest steelmaker, submitted proposals to the European Commission on Monday aimed at addressing its concerns over the deal’s impact on competition.
Thyssenkrupp Chief Executive Guido Kerkhoff, who is currently trying to break up the elevators-to-submarines conglomerate, has in the past said it would not be a disaster if the joint venture did not go ahead.
The Commission has until June 5 to review the firms’ proposals and make a decision.
A source said the companies’ concessions included selling two hot-dip galvanising plants in Spain and Belgium that supply the automotive industry.
They also proposed selling packaging steel activities operated by Tata Steel in Britain and Belgium, the source said, adding the Commission had dropped its concerns in the area of electrical steel.
“The offer is extensive and substantial. At the same time, it is acceptable to the joint venture partners and no risk to the industrial logic of the joint venture,” Kerkhoff said in a statement on Tuesday.
Thyssenkrupp declined to comment on the contents of the proposal. Tata Steel was not immediately available for comment.
The source said the groups would not make far-reaching concessions that would question the entire joint venture, which was set up to reduce overcapacity and create a stronger and more competitive player.
The planned joint venture is targeting 400-500 million euros ($448-$560 million) in annual synergies, a goal that would still be achievable under the proposals made on Monday, the first source said.
Overall, the assets offered for sale account for a low single-digit percentage of the joint venture’s pro-forma sales of 17 billion euros, that source added.